Re: ASP active procedure
Anand N Ilkal <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:11:58 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Brian, "Consider and ASP that goes ASP-UP with an SGP just to receive NOTIFY messages for its AS, and nothing else. This is permitted." the above comment pretty much solves my doubt. On 5 January 2011 15:54, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > arif, > > arif khan wrote: (Wed, > 05 Jan 2011 14:53:15) > > No It is wrong to keep it must........... > > > > You may send one or multiple ASP ACT message depending on the > > configuration of ASPs > > > > Suppose if you have 2 asp and you want to send aspac for both after > > receiving the ASP UP Ack msg from SGP.In this situation either wait > > for the second asp ack to send the aspac for both the asp or one by > > one. > > > > So for this reason the MAY tag is given. > > > > No. The reason is that it is not necessary for an ASP to ever > send an ASP Active message. > > Consider and ASP that goes ASP-UP with an SGP just to receive > NOTIFY messages for its AS, and nothing else. This is > permitted. > > Also, a backup ASP may never ever need to go active. This too > is permitted. > > MUST or SHOULD is terribly wrong. Please try to understand the > standard before trying to change it. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- with regards, Anand kumar Ilkal _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran