Re: A question about M3UA association setup between 1 ASP and 2 SGP

It is not a question of interoperability especially if the 2 ends are using
rfc3332.

My question is simple and clear: using rfc3332, is the message flow in
question, between an ASP and 2 STP, correct.

If you do not have the response, please let other persons take the response
!!!


Thank you.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
<[email protected]>wrote:

> mosbah,
>
> Although it may appear at first blush that RFC 3332 and RFC 4666
> interoperate, they do not.  Someone in France is risking their
> SS7 network to save a couple of bucks?  Tsk, tsk.
>
> --brian
>
> mosbah abdelkader wrote:                                            (Thu,
> 14 Apr 2011 16:21:32)
> >    Hi Brian,
> >    Dialogic SS7 stack still use rfc3332. A time ago, We have provided an
> >    mono-homed M3UA stack implementing rfc3332 to a customer and they have
> >    used it with France Telecom network and it works properly.
> >    Now we are implementing the multi-homed version with connection to
> more
> >    than one STP in the ASP side.
> >    The message flow that I have sent in the first mail shows the
> >    interaction of the ASP with 2 SGP (STP).
> >    So, supposing we are using rfc3332, still this configuration correct
> >    for the interaction between an ASP and 2 STP?
> >    Any guidance is very appreciated.
> >    --
> >    BR
> >    Abdelkader Mosbah
> >    On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
> >    <[1][email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >      mosbah,
> >      RFC 3332 is long obsolete.  Don't use it.  Your
> >      implementation must meet RFC 4666 to be interoperable.
> >      --brian
> >      mosbah abdelkader wrote:                          (Thu, 14 Apr 2011
> >      06:23:32)
> >
> >    >    I want just to know if that config works with other
> >    implementations.
> >    >    On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
> >
> >    >    <[1][2][email protected]> wrote:
> >    >
> >    >      mosbah,
> >    >      What did you think was the matter with it?
> >    >      --brian
> >    >      mosbah abdelkader wrote:                     (Wed, 13 Apr 2011
> >    >      16:06:57)
> >    >
> >    >    >    Hi,
> >    >    >    I have an M3UA configuration where an ASP communicates with
> 2
> >    SGP
> >    >    >    (STP). The file attached describes the M3UA message flow
> >    between
> >    >    the
> >    >    >    ASP and the 2 SGP.
> >    >    >    Is this sequence correct regarding M3UA specifications?
> >    >    >    I am using M3UA rfc3332.
> >    >    >    Please help.
> >    >    >    --
> >    >    >    Best Regards
> >    >    >    Abdelkader Mosbah
> >    --
> >    Brian F. G. Bidulock
> >    [3][email protected]
> >    [4]http://www.openss7.org/
> >
> > References
> >
> >    1. mailto:[email protected]
> >    2. mailto:[email protected]
> >    3. mailto:[email protected]
> >    4. http://www.openss7.org/
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran