Re: Regarding MSRP(rfc 4975)
prasun bheri <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:36:48 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADUAaiodDxGJx0BCBqCBT=oL06WBVv4Bn3c5JHMMq+7N8r6i8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, Got the answer to first question. response should not be given for report. second question. leave the session id empty in from path. Thanks & Regards Prasun On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, prasun bheri <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello Group, > > I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (MSRP) > > 1. When a local end point receives a REPORT request that contains a > message id which is not known to local end point, what should be done? > Is it ok to respond with 400 Bad request? > > 2. When a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP > should respond with 481 transaction response. > in this case, while building 481 response should the from-path contain a > session id or not? > > Thanks & Regards > Prasun Bheri > > > > _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple