Re: Regarding MSRP(rfc 4975)
Ben Campbell <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:39:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In regards to question 2--you also do not respond to a response. Thanks! Ben. On Aug 27, 2012, at 4:06 AM, prasun bheri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Got the answer to first question. response should not be given for report. second question. leave the session id empty in from path. > > Thanks & Regards > Prasun > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, prasun bheri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Group, > > I have two queries in regard to rfc 4975 (MSRP) > > 1. When a local end point receives a REPORT request that contains a message id which is not known to local end point, what should be done? > Is it ok to respond with 400 Bad request? > > 2. When a Request or Response is received with unknown session id local EP should respond with 481 transaction response. > in this case, while building 481 response should the from-path contain a session id or not? > > Thanks & Regards > Prasun Bheri > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Simple mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple