Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:12:40 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/13/12 11:29 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > The interworking between SIP-based voice and XMPP text messaging > is not standardized either. Does anyone have any information? It's funny you should ask. Emil Ivov, Enrico Marocco, and I have been working on that a bit here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax/ I am also planning to soon resurrect the entire series of documents I had underway several years ago, draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-* (core, IM, presence, etc.). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB6A3gACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzh+wCg4lajuJTMDRwd0gBZNXaPk18S Ls4AoIaiLEL1q75NM09qISSDHUdUhSD4 =NDw2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----