Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?

Hi Peter,

I am aware of this work and the effort that happened before it but for 
some reason I got the impression that there was very low energy behind it.

My impression was that the telcommunication operator community don't 
seem to care about it there is still the believe that a pure SIP-based 
approach will lead to success (and XMPP is not on their radar at all) 
and the XMPP community does not seem care about SIP.

Is this understanding wrong?

Ciao
Hannes

On 10/14/2012 03:12 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/13/12 11:29 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>> The interworking between SIP-based voice and XMPP text messaging
>> is not standardized either. Does anyone have any information?
>
> It's funny you should ask. Emil Ivov, Enrico Marocco, and I have been
> working on that a bit here:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax/
>
> I am also planning to soon resurrect the entire series of documents I
> had underway several years ago, draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-* (core, IM,
> presence, etc.).
>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlB6A3gACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzh+wCg4lajuJTMDRwd0gBZNXaPk18S
> Ls4AoIaiLEL1q75NM09qISSDHUdUhSD4
> =NDw2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>