Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?

(as chair)

This is an interesting discussion, and please feel free to continue it on the SIMPLE list, at least for now. 

But if work comes of it, that will most likely need to go through DISPATCH. Given the general lack of energy we've seen for SIMPLE lately, I think it's unlikely that we would recharter it in it's current form. Or at least, any recharter effort will be met with the same sort of scrutiny a DISPATCH or BoF proposal.

Thanks!

Ben.

On Oct 16, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> wrote:

> AFAIK the SIMPLE WG currently exists as a placeholder.
> All chartered work was done long ago. There has continued to be a low level of q/a discussion on the list.
> 
> But recently there has been more active interest in new work.
> 
> If we want to do more work, we should charter it, either by rechartering SIMPLE, by doing the work in XMPP, starting a new wg, or *something*.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
ly