Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:03:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > > A different effort may be considered which is what will make > XMPP acceptable as an extension to SIP based systems. > > This means not modifying SIMPLE but using XMPP as the > presence/IM protocol for SIP. > What is wrong with IM? MSRP based IM works fine, I thought we were focusing on presence here. > Usage of SIP AOR was mentioned before as an example. > Now we also have new tools, like GRUU, which maps one-to-one with a Full JID, so exploring what XMPP did right sounds like a good idea. Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects