Re: Dual registration without Outbound

Hi, 

 > So, you want to register both contacts to both registars, right?
 >
 > Example:
 >
 > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1 
 > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_2
 > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_2 ----- REG_1
 > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2

>no, like this:

 > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1  
 > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2
 > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1
 > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2

Now, in your example, if OB_1 and REG_2 fail you don't still don't have
redundancy :)

>if outbound does not mandate that UA must register each contact with
both ob proxies, my pleasant surprise was a too
>early one and ob draft falls back to the useless bin.

I don't have the spec in front of me, but I don't think it currently
talks about multiple contacts.

I guess this all comes back to Dean's question whether we need some new
text into the draft.

In order to avoid delaying the Outbound spec even more, I guess it could
also be an extension draft:"Outbound with multiple contacts", or
something like that...

Regards,

Christer





-- juha
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip