Re: Dual registration without Outbound

Nobody is talking about a "second version" of outbound.

Somebody just need to write a draft on high-availability. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 12:39
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: Dean Willis; [email protected]; Christer Holmberg
> Subject: RE: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound
> 
> Francois Audet writes:
> 
>  > But it's not currently in the spec. I view it as something 
> of high  > priority that we should be looking at. But we'll 
> never get there if we  > don't get outbound out the door first.
> 
> it takes years for UA vendors to implement outbound draft and 
> more than 10 years the followup version.  by then, sip may be 
> already replaced by something else.  so if you want outbound 
> to have any value, it needs to be get right the first shot.
> 
> also, it was not clear to me (and looks like also some 
> experts), what instance-id means and what effect it has to 
> forking to multiple contacts.  if everything in outbound is 
> not crystal clear, it makes no sense to publish it.
> 
> -- juha
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip