Re: Stupid question on flow use in outbound

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0884CD5E@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
 
>>But: if B2BUA-X controls gate-X, and B2BUA-Y controls gate-Y, you need
to make sure both signalling and media reaches X - OR that both media
and signalling reaches Y. 
>
>yes, unless B2BUA-X and B2BUA-Y talk to each other.

Sure.

>my point is that you cannot write a sip spec that prohibits signalling
and media from using different paths/ip addresses.
>
>if your environment is such that it will not work, then you have to
configure your UA in such a way that it always uses same path/ip
address.  i don't see how this would be a protocol issue.

The initial point was that it should be allowed to register different
capabilities per flow - in case there are use-cases and architectures
where it could be useful.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.