Re: Stupid question on flow use in outbound
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0884CD5E@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
>>But: if B2BUA-X controls gate-X, and B2BUA-Y controls gate-Y, you need to make sure both signalling and media reaches X - OR that both media and signalling reaches Y. > >yes, unless B2BUA-X and B2BUA-Y talk to each other. Sure. >my point is that you cannot write a sip spec that prohibits signalling and media from using different paths/ip addresses. > >if your environment is such that it will not work, then you have to configure your UA in such a way that it always uses same path/ip address. i don't see how this would be a protocol issue. The initial point was that it should be allowed to register different capabilities per flow - in case there are use-cases and architectures where it could be useful. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip