Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Content-Type vs Info-Package [was RE: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: multiple packages per INFO]
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF083CCFB2@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
Hi, (Combining e-mails again) Paul: ==== >>>For SDP, you find the part by looking for the one with >>>Content-Disposition:session. If there is a part with no C-D >>>header then one with a C-T of application/sdp defaults to >>>"session". So its all about C-D. >> >>The C-D header gives you information about the body, yes, but I don't >>think it helps you to FIND the body. >> >>That's what the SIP and MIME ABNFs are for. >> >Oh, sorry. I didn't really mean "find". I meant "choose the appropriate body part". >>For SDP, you find the part by looking for the one with >>Content-Disposition:session. If there is a part with no C-D header then >>one with a C-T of application/sdp defaults to "session". So its all >>about C-D. > >Oops, I just realized I didn't state this the way I meant... > >For *offers and answers* you find the part by looking for the one with >Content-Disposition:session. If there is a part with no C-D header then >one with a C-T of application/sdp defaults to "session". So its all >about C-D. (In theory, application/sdp is just one of the C-Ts that >might be used to encode offers and answers.) I am not sure what you mean by "body part". Is this a problem if we only allow a single info-package per message? Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip