Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Content-Type vs Info-Package [was RE: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: multiple packages per INFO]
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Christer Holmberg wrote: > So, just to make sure I understand: you are talking about a case where the INFO does contain a multipart message body, but only one of the mimes contains an actual info-package (the other mime(s) contains something else)? pretty much. And to distinguish those, you need more than C-T. But I think as we have been discussing, if we only allow one info package per INFO, then the Info-Package header belongs in the message, not in the body part. I'll revise your example a bit: INFO sip:[email protected] To:... From:... Some-Header: CID:abcdefg Info-Package: foo Content-Type:multipart/mixed Content-Length:... --boundary Content-Type: application/foo-data Content-Disposition: package;handling=required foo data --boundary Content-ID: abcdefg Content-Type: application/some-header-data Content-Disposition: by-reference;handling=optional some other (non-info package) data --boundary-- In the above I have used C-D of "package" to identify the part that contains the info package. That is yet to be determined, but I think it needs to be well defined, even if it is "render". A more straightforward case would be: INFO sip:[email protected] To:... From:... Info-Package: foo Content-Type: application/foo-data Content-Disposition: package;handling=required Content-Length:10 foo data _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip