Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Content-Type vs Info-Package [was RE: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: multiple packages per INFO]
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 24, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > Christer Holmberg wrote: > >> So, just to make sure I understand: you are talking about a case >> where the INFO does contain a multipart message body, but only one >> of the mimes contains an actual info-package (the other mime(s) >> contains something else)? > > pretty much. And to distinguish those, you need more than C-T. > But I think as we have been discussing, if we only allow one info > package per INFO, then the Info-Package header belongs in the > message, not in the body part. > So the error condition is you have two body parts of types allowed for the INFO package, but only one of them is the "real" info, and the other part is from some other extension. If it hurts, don't do it? Seriously, a Content-Disposition would sort this out. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip