Re: How to make draft-ietf-sip-199 more useful
"Francois Audet" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1A6DEB98@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> |
> The agreement in Dublin was to not say anything about > sipfrag. But, I am ok with putting it back, especially if > people want more use-cases. I guess it could be optional for > the UAC to inidicate support of sipfrag. Hi Christer, It doesn't have to be sipfrag. Just the plain value of the error response code would work too. Whatever is easier. I just think that getting the reason WHY the fork failed is useful. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip