Re: How to make draft-ietf-sip-199 more useful
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F981@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
Hi, >>The agreement in Dublin was to not say anything about sipfrag. But, I >>am ok with putting it back, especially if people want more use-cases. >>I guess it could be optional for the UAC to inidicate support of >>sipfrag. > >It doesn't have to be sipfrag. Just the plain value of the error response code would work too. Whatever is easier. Maybe the Reason header could be used? Or a new parameter. I agree that sipfrag is a little too "heavy" for sending a response code. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip