Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Anders Kristensen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dean Willis wrote: > Anders Kristensen wrote: > >> I think we're talking past each other. The problem is not correlating to >> the dialog, it's correlating the app-level response to a particular >> app-level request within a given dialog. > > > Use a transaction-correlation ID in your application-level protocol > (i.e, in the package specification) if you need this sort of function. > It's not SIP's problem. I don't think I'm trying to make it "SIP's problem". I'm arguing that if a response is needed it's much simpler and just all around better to do the response-to-request correlation by sending the app-level response in the 200 response to INFO as opposed to sending it in a separate INFO going in the opposite direction. It doesn't violate layering and I haven't heard of any real problem with it. Anders _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip