Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO

Anders Kristensen wrote:
> 
> 
> Dean Willis wrote:
>> Anders Kristensen wrote:
>>
>>> I think we're talking past each other. The problem is not correlating to
>>> the dialog, it's correlating the app-level response to a particular
>>> app-level request within a given dialog.
>>
>>
>> Use a transaction-correlation ID in your application-level protocol
>> (i.e, in the package specification) if you need this sort of function.
>> It's not SIP's problem.
> 
> I don't think I'm trying to make it "SIP's problem".
> 
> I'm arguing that if a response is needed it's much simpler and just all
> around better to do the response-to-request correlation by sending the
> app-level response in the 200 response to INFO as opposed to sending it
> in a separate INFO going in the opposite direction. It doesn't violate
> layering and I haven't heard of any real problem with it.

It means that the stack can't send a 200 response to INFO until it has
been directed to by the application. That seems like a layering problem
to me, not to mention a major stack rewrite.

--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip