Re: Summary (Was: [Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986])

Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> It's ambiguous with path-rootless, no?

I don't think so.  I don't think you can generate a token with
"[" and "]" using the path-rootless production rule (unless
they are escaped.)

> But anyway I think the AD's should weigh in on what WG should work on
> the fix.  The fix needs to be applicable to all URIs, and I don't
> think we have all the right folks to know what the rfc3986 semantics
> really means generally.

Understood; however, I was asked by the chairs to round up
a WG summary on this one.  I suspect that once we do so,
the chairs will get the ADs involved to move this along in
the shape they see fit.

Hence, please do eyeball the path-rootless production rule
and make sure my understanding is correct.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip