Re: Summary (Was: [Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986])
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC3138E1639A6@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:12 PM > > Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > It's ambiguous with path-rootless, no? > > I don't think so. I don't think you can generate a token with > "[" and "]" using the path-rootless production rule (unless > they are escaped.) Right, but I meant it's ambiguous when it's NOT an IPv6 address. Which will probably be a lot of the time. :) Also, I don't really understand what the semantics means for "authority" vs. "path-rootless" in that RFC as defined. What does an app do differently in those two cases? -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip