Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986

"Dale Worley" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Organization Nortel Networks
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:03 -0600, Dean Willis wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to concur with Theo. 3986 is just broken.

Perhaps so, given that the different URI formats have different sets of
acceptable characters -- why would that be?

But what is the plan for going forward?

Dale


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.