Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986
"Dale Worley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Organization | Nortel Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:34 +0000, Theo Zourzouvillys wrote: > Both are going to require change (although we don't need world AND dog > to agree with a 3261 update), but seems to me that updating 3986 seems > like a far more appropriate path to take given the number of other > affected URI schemes as Hadriel pointed out. As far as I can see, all the schemes that Hadriel pointed out have exactly the same problem as sip:, they permit "mailbox"-style components but do not specify how they are to be encoded if the characters in question are not valid by RFC 3986. > I have no objection to the removal of '/' and '?' from the user part, > but the replacing of '[' and ']' seems [quite] urgh. It's "urgh" only if you've implemented IPv6, I suppose. Conveniently, our project hasn't. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip