Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03: comments and questions
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bob said: I'm inclined to say that since the INFO is not suppose to change > dialog state, a 489 response to an INFO should not destroy the INVITE > dialog usage. With SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY its a failure of the dialog > establishing/target-refresh request which is essential to the dialog > usage. But INFO is not essential to the INVITE dialog usage, so > applying the last sentence above makes sense to me. Doesn't a 489 in any in-dialog Non-Invite-Transaction destroy the dialog usage? It seems like we break the state machine if we make INFO a special case. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip