Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03: comments and questions

SIP has a state machine??? You could fool me....

Where can I find it? Do not say 3261

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: Bob Penfield <[email protected]>
Cc: SIP IETF <[email protected]>; Brett Tate <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat Mar 07 18:30:22 2009
Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03: comments and questions

Bob said:
I'm inclined to say that since the INFO is not suppose to change
> dialog state, a 489 response to an INFO should not destroy the INVITE
> dialog usage. With SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY its a failure of the dialog
> establishing/target-refresh request which is essential to the dialog
> usage. But INFO is not essential to the INVITE dialog usage, so
> applying the last sentence above makes sense to me.

Doesn't a 489 in any in-dialog Non-Invite-Transaction destroy the  
dialog usage? It seems like we break the state machine if we make INFO  
a special case.

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip