comments on draft-barnes-sip-rfc4244bis-00.txt

My main comment at this time, is that this bis document doesn't seem 
much different from the original. Section 10 calls out a bunch of things 
that I would put in the 'minor' category - certainly not worth a 
wholesale bis document if this is all we do.

I think it'd be worth having a high level discussion on the changes we'd 
like to make to this document, and assess whether there are enough to 
warrant a bis. For example, many have complained about the complexity of 
HI; are there changes meant to help that? So far, frankly, the few 
comments on this draft have been suggestions for additions for the most 
part, and NOT simplifications. Is this meant as an omnibus for a bunch 
of extensions to HI?

Thanks,
Jonathan R.
-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   111 Wood Avenue South
Cisco Fellow                                   Iselin, NJ 08830
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
[email protected]
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip