comments on draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00.txt
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Few comments. While this is not a bad idea, its not clear what the point of it is, given draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-01.txt suggests anyway a different header field for dialog identification through b2bua. Indeed the introduction in this document still talks about dialog correlation. Is this meant as a way to fix up existing call-id using extensions in a backwards compatible way, while session-id is for future things? I do apologize I did not follow much of the discussion at the end of last year if this was discussed then. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 111 Wood Avenue South Cisco Fellow Iselin, NJ 08830 Cisco, Voice Technology Group [email protected] http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084 http://www.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip