Re: New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep

"Francois Audet" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1D267EBE@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Dean, 

There is no reason to do so.

There is no "similar but not identical text" in draft-keep.
Draft-keep only defines a parameter that allows the usage
of the keep-alive defined in draft-ietf-sip-outbound, outside of
the context of the registration procedures
of draft-ietf-sip-outbound. 

Currently, the two drafts are carefully choregraphed to
be consistent. I don't want to undo this at the last minute.

Note that some other drafts in the queue are dependent on 
draft-ietf-outbound (e.g., draft-ietf-sip-sips). I really
don't want us to undo our work for no good reason.

I would recommend moving draft-keep swiftly to WG document.
I believe it should rapidly move into last call.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 20:54
> To: Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00)
> Cc: [email protected]; Christer Holmberg
> Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
> 
> 
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Christer has updated the document based on the action item from 
> > Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and 
> modeled as the 
> > proposed DISPATCH WG).  If folks could please review the 
> document and 
> > raise any concerns on the document now, that would be 
> appreciated. We 
> > ask specifically for an answer to the question:  Do you support the 
> > document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)?  A simple 
> > "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this 
> > document, could you please provide the reason.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> So, given the outpouring of support, should we pull back the 
> draft- ietf-sip-outbound and re-write it to refer to the 
> keepalive mechanism of this draft instead of containing 
> similar but not identical text?
> 
> --
> Dean
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.