Re: The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00
Victor Pascual Ávila <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> wrote: (snip) > As for the backwards-compatibility argument, I guess that it will > take same long time to get UAs do session-id, so IMO an improvement > is only possible under an assumption that network-asserted session-id > is easier to introduce than UA-asserted, right? That appears > meaningful to me. I'm still worried about out-of-dialog messages referencing to Call-ID values. It sounds like "you break it, you fix it". -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip