Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 1, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > > Dan Wing wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> But the transit ISP should be routing the packets using their >>> source and destination IP addresses, not mucking about in the >>> application protocol. >> The transit SIP provider has every interest in hiding the IP >> addresses >> of their own equipment and of the actual peers. Otherwise, the peers >> may make their own business agreement and circumvent the 'service' >> being provided by the transit SIP provider -- or so the argument >> goes. > > If the peers can circumvent the SP and make their own business > agreement, then perhaps the SP wasn't actually providing a service. > And they're afraid the other folks will find out? Hang 'em from the yardarm, Captain Bligh. Those fellows are pirates! -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip