Re: Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07

"Spencer Dawkins" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07I apologize for this post in advance (lowest added value post to this mailing list in some time), but

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt

says 

B. Basic Formatting                                        |  3.1
                                                           |
    o   Only printable ASCII characters                    |  3.1(1),
                                                           |    3.1(4)
    o   No lines exceeding 72 characters                   |  3.1(2)
        [This is especially important for "as is" tables   |
         and figures, which cannot be easily reformatted by|
         the RFC Editor.]   

Thanks,

Spencer
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Attila Sipos 
  To: Francois Audet ; Christer Holmberg ; [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:16 PM
  Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07


  Francois' comment about the diagram
  also brought to my attention the fact that figure 3
  is probably "illegal" for RFCs - isn't there usually
  an 80 character line-length limit?

  Anyway, I've "re-drawn" figure 3 and removed
  the word "leg" - this can obviously be made
  clear with an explanation.

     UAC           P1               P2               UAS_2     UAS_3    UAS_4
      --- INVITE--->
                    --- INVITE (2) ------------------->
                    --- INVITE ----->
                                     --- INVITE (3) ------------>
                                     --- INVITE (4) --------------------->
                                     <-- 18x (3) ----------------
                    <-- 18x (3) -----
      <-- 18x (3) --
                                     <-- 18x (4) -------------------------
                    <-- 18x (4) -----
      <-- 18x (4) --
                                     <-- 4xx (3) ----------------
                                     --- ACK (3) --------------->
                                     <-- 4xx (4) -------------------------
                                     --- ACK (4) ------------------------>
                    <-- 4xx (3) ----
                    --- ACK (3) --->
      <-- 199 (3) --
      <-- 199 (4) --
                    <-- 200 (2) ----------------------
      <-- 200 (2) --
      --- ACK (2) ->
                    --- ACK (2) --------------------->

  Only issue now is that this makes figure 3 inconsistent with the others.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: [email protected] on behalf of Francois Audet
  Sent: Tue 07/04/2009 18:16
  To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07


  Minor comment: It would improve readability of the Figures if the vertical bars where ]
  included in the pictures.


  ________________________________

          From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
          Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 00:31
          To: [email protected]
          Subject: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07
         
         


          Hi,

          I have put together a new version (-07) of the 199 draft, based on the latest discussions.

          The changes are in chapters 5 (new note added) and 6 (text simplified). 100rel and SDP o/a impacts have also been added to chapters 5 and 6 (I have still kept chapters 9 and 10, though).

          http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt> 

          Regards,

          Christer

  _______________________________________________
  Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
  This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
  Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
  Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip





  .



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
  This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
  Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
  Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.