Re: Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07

Thanks Spencer and Attila! I'll fix the flows.
 
Regards,
 
Christer

________________________________

From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Attila Sipos; Francois Audet; Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07


I apologize for this post in advance (lowest added value post to this
mailing list in some time), but
 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt
 
says 
 
B. Basic Formatting                                        |  3.1
                                                           |
    o   Only printable ASCII characters                    |  3.1(1),
                                                           |    3.1(4)
    o   No lines exceeding 72 characters                   |  3.1(2)
        [This is especially important for "as is" tables   |
         and figures, which cannot be easily reformatted by|
         the RFC Editor.]   
 
Thanks,
 
Spencer

	----- Original Message ----- 
	From: Attila Sipos <mailto:[email protected]>  
	To: Francois Audet <mailto:[email protected]>  ; Christer
Holmberg <mailto:[email protected]>  ; [email protected] 
	Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:16 PM
	Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07

	Francois' comment about the diagram
	also brought to my attention the fact that figure 3
	is probably "illegal" for RFCs - isn't there usually
	an 80 character line-length limit?
	 
	Anyway, I've "re-drawn" figure 3 and removed
	the word "leg" - this can obviously be made
	clear with an explanation.
	 
	   UAC           P1               P2               UAS_2
UAS_3    UAS_4
	    --- INVITE--->
	                  --- INVITE (2) ------------------->
	                  --- INVITE ----->
	                                   --- INVITE (3) ------------>
	                                   --- INVITE (4)
--------------------->
	                                   <-- 18x (3) ----------------
	                  <-- 18x (3) -----
	    <-- 18x (3) --
	                                   <-- 18x (4)
-------------------------
	                  <-- 18x (4) -----
	    <-- 18x (4) --
	                                   <-- 4xx (3) ----------------
	                                   --- ACK (3) --------------->
	                                   <-- 4xx (4)
-------------------------
	                                   --- ACK (4)
------------------------>
	                  <-- 4xx (3) ----
	                  --- ACK (3) --->
	    <-- 199 (3) --
	    <-- 199 (4) --
	                  <-- 200 (2) ----------------------
	    <-- 200 (2) --
	    --- ACK (2) ->
	                  --- ACK (2) --------------------->
	

	Only issue now is that this makes figure 3 inconsistent with the
others.
	 
	 
	 

________________________________

	From: [email protected] on behalf of Francois Audet
	Sent: Tue 07/04/2009 18:16
	To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07
	
	

	Minor comment: It would improve readability of the Figures if
the vertical bars where ]
	included in the pictures.
	
	
	________________________________
	
	        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
	        Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 00:31
	        To: [email protected]
	        Subject: [Sip] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sip-199-07
	       
	       
	
	
	        Hi,
	
	        I have put together a new version (-07) of the 199
draft, based on the latest discussions.
	
	        The changes are in chapters 5 (new note added) and 6
(text simplified). 100rel and SDP o/a impacts have also been added to
chapters 5 and 6 (I have still kept chapters 9 and 10, though).
	
	
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-199-07.txt> 
	
	        Regards,
	
	        Christer
	
	_______________________________________________
	Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
	This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
	Use [email protected] for questions on current
sip
	Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of
sip
	



	.

	
________________________________


	

	_______________________________________________
	Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
	This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
	Use [email protected] for questions on current
sip
	Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of
sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip