Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard

Adam Roach wrote:

> Yes, it does. The question is whether that belongs in the v6 document, 
> or if we need to do a similar rev for port numbers. Seeing as how the 
> issue applies equally to v4 and v6, I'd say that putting it in the v6 
> document would be an expansion of scope that is inappropriate at the 
> current state of the document's development.
> 
> We probably should log it in the bug tracker (bugs.sipit.org), and not 
> address it in the document at hand.

That works for me.

	Thanks,
	Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.