Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard

On 4/27/10 09:09, Apr 27, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>
> Adam Roach wrote:
>
>> Yes, it does. The question is whether that belongs in the v6 
>> document, or if we need to do a similar rev for port numbers. Seeing 
>> as how the issue applies equally to v4 and v6, I'd say that putting 
>> it in the v6 document would be an expansion of scope that is 
>> inappropriate at the current state of the document's development.
>>
>> We probably should log it in the bug tracker (bugs.sipit.org), and 
>> not address it in the document at hand.
>
> That works for me.

It is now logged as http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=777

/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.