Re: draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcingnotifications when state has not changed
"Mary Barnes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sipping |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1E787A56@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> |
Byron, Just a note that this document has migrated over to the SIPCORE WG (to be completed) and the document name changed enroute. Here's the new version: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-00 So, you might want to jump over to SIPCORE with this question. Mary. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Byron Campen Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:00 PM To: sipping Subject: [Sipping] draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcingnotifications when state has not changed It appears that the normative language in this draft requires the notifier to send a notification if the force interval has elapsed, even when state has not changed since the last notification. Reading over some past discussion on list, I got the impression that this was not the intent. So which is it? Best regards, Byron Campen _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP