Re: draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing notifications when state has not changed
"Brian Rosen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sipping |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <109101c9eae2$f8ef9890$eacec9b0$@net> |
I would say yes, the intention is to force an update even if nothing changed. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Byron Campen > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:00 PM > To: sipping > Subject: [Sipping] draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing > notifications when state has not changed > > It appears that the normative language in this draft requires the > notifier to send a notification if the force interval has elapsed, even > when state has not changed since the last notification. Reading over > some past discussion on list, I got the impression that this was not > the intent. So which is it? > > Best regards, > Byron Campen _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP