Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)

I would make it

Corrected Text
--------------
   3) Output the results.

       Set C[0] = A[s]
       For i = 1 to n
           C[i] = R[s][i]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: Jim Schaad
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)
> 
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected.
> >
> >
> > I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3
> > the value of t might not be well defined, however
> >
> > 1.  the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be
> > redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both
> > locations that it occurs.
> 
> So, you have an alternate errata to propose?
> 
> --Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime