Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)
Dwayne Litzenberger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Oh, good catch. I saw R[t] but missed A[t]. Sorry about that. On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:29:47PM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote: >I would make it > >Corrected Text >-------------- > 3) Output the results. > > Set C[0] = A[s] > For i = 1 to n > C[i] = R[s][i] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM >> To: Jim Schaad >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) >> >> On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected. >> > >> > >> > I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3 >> > the value of t might not be well defined, however >> > >> > 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be >> > redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both >> > locations that it occurs. >> >> So, you have an alternate errata to propose? >> >> --Paul Hoffman > -- Dwayne C. Litzenberger <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 19E1 1FE8 B3CF F273 ED17 4A24 928C EC13 39C2 5CF7 _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime