Re: Key lookup service via draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> 23 Mar 2016 14:33:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime,gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I think the benefits of an authoritative server out weighs the worries that > you suggest. In the web world, its been very helpful to be certain what > one should chain up via browser certificate pinning or HPKP. A whole host > of malfeasance was found this way. Even in the limited use that S/MIME has > today, in government and defense, its likely to be very useful. >> The only thing that depends on DNSSEC for trust is the new option for a >> domain to publish a S/MIME signing key for its users' keys. Lacking >> DNSSEC, the traditional CA PKI is still there. If the WG thinks the domain's key should be authoritative, that'd be fine with me. We didn't want to make any unilateral changes to the trust model without it being clear that it's a change and that there's consensus behind it. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime