Re: Key lookup service via draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00
"Miller, Timothy J." <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:00:09 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime,gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/23/16, 1:33 PM, "smime on behalf of John R Levine" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >If the WG thinks the domain's key should be authoritative, that'd be fine >with me. We didn't want to make any unilateral changes to the trust model >without it being clear that it's a change and that there's consensus >behind it. So an authoritative service makes sense in an Enterprise context, but not in a consumer context. How do you preserve consumer choice if Yahoo! owns their email service, but they want to certify keys elsewhere? -- T _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime