Re: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2633 (5019)

It would be

id-aa-encrypKeyPref -- sic -- OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= ...

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: smime <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 10:14 AM
> To: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>
> Cc: Josh Soref <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>; IETF SMIME
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [smime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2633 (5019)
> 
> 
> 
> > On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:52, RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Any objections to adding a note in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis along the
> same lines as the note for receipentKeyId?
> 
> It’s slightly different than renaming receipentKeyId because this is an OID so
> you could also do this:
> 
> id-aa-encryptKeyPref OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= id-aa-encrypKeyPref
> 
> But I also don’t have an issue with just adding the note.
> 
> spt
> _______________________________________________
> smime mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime