Re: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2633 (5019)

Thank you.  I have sent a follow up message to the secretariat to
correct the text in the errata marked as HFDU.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be
>
> id-aa-encrypKeyPref -- sic -- OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= ...
>
> Jim
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: smime <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 10:14 AM
>> To: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Josh Soref <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>; IETF SMIME
>> <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [smime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2633 (5019)
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:52, RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Any objections to adding a note in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis along the
>> same lines as the note for receipentKeyId?
>>
>> It’s slightly different than renaming receipentKeyId because this is an OID so
>> you could also do this:
>>
>> id-aa-encryptKeyPref OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= id-aa-encrypKeyPref
>>
>> But I also don’t have an issue with just adding the note.
>>
>> spt
>> _______________________________________________
>> smime mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime