Re: Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto)

Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:59:51 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Organization Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/5/2021 5:56 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Tim Wicinski writes:
> 
>> I'm with Dave on the idea of being Experimental.
>>
>>
>> I know that Delivered-To has been around for a long time, but I always
>> thought havingĀ theĀ email address and the time stamp on Delivered-To would
>> reading headers a bit easier for this person.
> 
> I don't recall ever seeing a timestamp in Delivered-To:, it was always 
> just an address.
> 
> Received: headers have all the timestamps I ever need.


You got there just ahead of me.  I had the same reaction.

Not that timestamp info doesn't seen like an interesting feature, but it 
hasn't been discussion and, so far, isn't in any of the existing 
examples we've seen.

Timestamps seem like such a strong benefit to make it worth considering 
how to add this capability to the spec.  Yes?

Or is the Received field sufficient?  Easy to believe it is.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net