Re: Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto)

Yes the received field is sufficient. These were thoughts from decades ago when people paid me to crawl headers.  That isn’t the case these days.  

Tim

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 5, 2021, at 21:00, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 8/5/2021 5:56 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Tim Wicinski writes:
>>> I'm with Dave on the idea of being Experimental.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I know that Delivered-To has been around for a long time, but I always
>>> thought having the email address and the time stamp on Delivered-To would
>>> reading headers a bit easier for this person.
>> I don't recall ever seeing a timestamp in Delivered-To:, it was always just an address.
>> Received: headers have all the timestamps I ever need.
> 
> 
> You got there just ahead of me.  I had the same reaction.
> 
> Not that timestamp info doesn't seen like an interesting feature, but it hasn't been discussion and, so far, isn't in any of the existing examples we've seen.
> 
> Timestamps seem like such a strong benefit to make it worth considering how to add this capability to the spec.  Yes?
> 
> Or is the Received field sufficient?  Easy to believe it is.
> 
> d/
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-smtp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp