Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:37:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Brandenburg InternetWorking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/6/2021 4:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 01:49:44PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: > >> Since you are promising not to repeat yourself, does that mean you might >> finally respond to the current question about adequacy of the current >> draft. Ideally that would include details about concerns with the text. >> Extra points for suggesting specific improvements. > > The draft suggests an "experiment" which was conducted and concluded > two-plus decades ago. The "Delivered-To" header has been in wide use > since it was introduced IIRC by Dan Bernstein in Qmail. sigh. the label is an RFC-related term. This has been explained in an earlier posting. The label does not affect the adequacy or problems with the substance of the document. > Who benefits from the experiment? Does the benefit exceed the cost? So, you haven't actually read the document's discussion of these issues? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net