Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom,gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> Martin Stiemerling writes: Martin> as you may have heard: the MIDCOM WG is currently doing a Martin> protocol evaluation which protocol to use as the MIDCOM Martin> protocol. SNMPv3 is amongst these candidates (diameter, Martin> cops(-pr), megaco). Would you strongly recommend to use Martin> SNMPv3 as the MIDCOM protocol without having a bad feeling? Feeling is one dimension in a multi-dimensional space. And we all know that SNMP has a reputation which is kind of special. Anyway, it usually makes sense to also look at the functional requirements and the features offered by a protocol if you are not completely driven by feelings. Are the MIDCOM requirements spelled out somewhere? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>