RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom,gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F74EF3316D9CD4118D8400508BAEDCAA07A59DF1@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
I believe so: RFC3304 Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: donderdag 5 december 2002 16:18 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? > > > > >>>>> Martin Stiemerling writes: > > Martin> as you may have heard: the MIDCOM WG is currently doing a > Martin> protocol evaluation which protocol to use as the MIDCOM > Martin> protocol. SNMPv3 is amongst these candidates (diameter, > Martin> cops(-pr), megaco). Would you strongly recommend to use > Martin> SNMPv3 as the MIDCOM protocol without having a bad feeling? > > Feeling is one dimension in a multi-dimensional space. And we all know > that SNMP has a reputation which is kind of special. > > Anyway, it usually makes sense to also look at the functional > requirements and the features offered by a protocol if you are not > completely driven by feelings. Are the MIDCOM requirements spelled out > somewhere? > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder > <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/> > >