RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.midcom,gmane.ietf.snmpv3
Message-ID <F74EF3316D9CD4118D8400508BAEDCAA07A59DF1@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
I believe so: RFC3304

Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: donderdag 5 december 2002 16:18
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
> 
> 
> 
> >>>>> Martin Stiemerling writes:
> 
> Martin> as you may have heard: the MIDCOM WG is currently doing a
> Martin> protocol evaluation which protocol to use as the MIDCOM
> Martin> protocol. SNMPv3 is amongst these candidates (diameter,
> Martin> cops(-pr), megaco).  Would you strongly recommend to use
> Martin> SNMPv3 as the MIDCOM protocol without having a bad feeling?
> 
> Feeling is one dimension in a multi-dimensional space. And we all know
> that SNMP has a reputation which is kind of special.
> 
> Anyway, it usually makes sense to also look at the functional
> requirements and the features offered by a protocol if you are not
> completely driven by feelings. Are the MIDCOM requirements spelled out
> somewhere?
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder    
> <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.