Re: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Network Associates Laboratories |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> This is actually a distinct negative for SNMPv3: complete abdication > of the problem of key distribution. With COPS and MEGACO you get TLS > and/or IKE/KINK. SNMPv3 has nothing. For Midcom, I'd think this is a > significant problem. FYI, there is also a kerberos SNMP draft (2 actually) and an implementation of it in the Net-SNMP toolkit. The IESG are not allowing these IDs (or any other security models) to be considered for the standards track at this time, however. There have been many other discussions surrounding other session-based security models, but no IDs have been written for them yet. -- Wes Hardaker Network Associates Laboratories