RE: coex last call

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:20:56 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.snmpv3
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155D6C3D2@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
No objection from me. In fact I support the change.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrington, David [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: maandag 3 februari 2003 23:01
> To: [email protected] (E-mail)
> Subject: coex last call
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to determine consensus on the following change. 
> It is my impression that we have rough consensus to make the 
> change. Does anybody strongly object to making the proposed change?
> 
> >So I still say that right thing to do is to change "MUST" to "SHOULD"
> >in paragraph (3) of the first numbered list in Section 2.1.1 and to
> >move this paragraph into the 2nd list in Section 2.1.1 (which is the
> >list of changes that are desirable but not absolutely required).
> 
> dbh
> 
> David Harrington
> Network Management Architect
> Office of the CTO
> Enterasys Networks
>  
>