RE: coex last call
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:20:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155D6C3D2@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
No objection from me. In fact I support the change. Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Harrington, David [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: maandag 3 februari 2003 23:01 > To: [email protected] (E-mail) > Subject: coex last call > > > Hi, > > I am trying to determine consensus on the following change. > It is my impression that we have rough consensus to make the > change. Does anybody strongly object to making the proposed change? > > >So I still say that right thing to do is to change "MUST" to "SHOULD" > >in paragraph (3) of the first numbered list in Section 2.1.1 and to > >move this paragraph into the 2nd list in Section 2.1.1 (which is the > >list of changes that are desirable but not absolutely required). > > dbh > > David Harrington > Network Management Architect > Office of the CTO > Enterasys Networks > >