RE: coex last call

No objection.  I made that change already in what I sent to Bert.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:21 PM
To: [email protected] (E-mail)
Subject: RE: coex last call


No objection from me. In fact I support the change.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrington, David [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: maandag 3 februari 2003 23:01
> To: [email protected] (E-mail)
> Subject: coex last call
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to determine consensus on the following change.
> It is my impression that we have rough consensus to make the 
> change. Does anybody strongly object to making the proposed change?
> 
> >So I still say that right thing to do is to change "MUST" to "SHOULD"

> >in paragraph (3) of the first numbered list in Section 2.1.1 and to 
> >move this paragraph into the 2nd list in Section 2.1.1 (which is the 
> >list of changes that are desirable but not absolutely required).
> 
> dbh
> 
> David Harrington
> Network Management Architect
> Office of the CTO
> Enterasys Networks
>  
>