(unknown)

[192.94.214.100])
	by lists.tislabs.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4QKupc20516
	for <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 May 2004 16:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
csmap (V6.0)
	id srcAAAm8aOWC; Wed, 26 May 04 16:55:53 -0400
To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Snmpv3-wg (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
    "'Grainne Foley'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SNMP Community MIB
References: 
<7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504678AB8@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
	<00de01c44352$3f1904c0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
	<[email protected]>
	<000a01c4435b$524bc9c0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
From: Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
Organization: Sparta
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:57:56 -0700
In-Reply-To: <000a01c4435b$524bc9c0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> (Randy Presuhn's
  message of "Wed, 26 May 2004 12:54:57 -0700")
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk

 >>>>> On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:54:57 -0700, "Randy Presuhn" 
<[email protected]> said:

Randy> Are you saying that they believe the level of pain (cost of
Randy> setting it up) is greater than the value of the assets they'd
Randy> be protecting?

It's likely they're protecting it via the more traditional approaches:
source filtering, dedicated management planes, etc.

But I didn't ask them *why* they weren't using it.  Only if they were
or not.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta